Comments on: RssCloud Atom Extension

By: Deneen Sayre

Deneen Sayre — Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:54:24 +0000

I really liked %BLOGTITLE%. Many Atlanta SEO services leave loose ends such as dead links or don’t produce enough one way links to get your webpage ranked properly.

By: Matt Terenzio

Matt Terenzio — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:36:58 +0000

Hmm, didn’t see this until Dave just linked to it.

Seems IP issue fix underway with the advent of the domain parameter.

I guess you mean registerprocedure should be optional since it is empty on HTTP Post. Makes sense. No big deal.

lastly, I believe there has been talk on PSHB list about the order of the hub elements in the document actually implicitly stating their priority.

What do you think of that?

By: Mason Lee

Mason Lee — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 08:13:13 +0000

Hi, Joseph. Thanks for looking it over. (And thanks for RssCloudifying my wordpress blog!)

I haven’t yet heard anyone suggest improvements to rssCloud that would affect this part of the spec, but actually I can think of two:

1. The “registerProcedure” attribute should be optional.
2. If multiple cloud elements are allowed for a single feed, each could have an optional “priority” int attribute to say, “This one is primary, this one is backup.” 10, 20, 30, etc.

Neither seem strictly necessary though. Not as important as fixing the “same-IP” issue, which I was happy to hear on the BadHair.us podcast Dave agrees is worth consideration.

By: Joseph Scott

Joseph Scott — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:57:05 +0000

I think this looks like a reasonable approach to adding rssCloud support to Atom. Might be worth waiting to move forward on this until any tweaks/adjustments to the original rssCloud details are made. Once folks are confident that the issues have been addressed your proposed extension could be updated and reviewed in more detail.