Archive for the ‘Social Networks’ Category

Better Privacy Control Needed for iPhone

April 24, 2009

A newly downloaded iPhone application can’t locate you without your explicit approval. You get the message “Application X would like to use your current location.” Why isn’t this privacy control extended to other, more sensitive areas of the device? As it stands, a new app needs no permission to open a network connection, activate your microphone and camera, access all of your photos, or read your entire address book, and there’s no restriction on what of that information can be sent out to any server anywhere.

Because the iPhone is a closed device (meaning you can’t install any low-level controls) there’s no way to see what your apps are doing with any of your private data, aside from your location. On the desktop, we have some rudimentary safeguards available, such as the LittleSnitch application, but there’s nothing like this for iPhone, and no possibility of anyone but Apple making such a thing.

The iPhone’s location privacy control is a good thing. I’d like to see that extended to other areas of the device.

Borange – find time with friends

July 12, 2008

Borange IconVery pleased to announce the near-future availability of Borange.app for the iPhone.

Answering the age old question, what rhymes with orange?

What is private, the photo or its content?

May 18, 2008

For the sake of more theorizing on the use of Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems to enforce privacy constraints in digital social systems, let’s take “the privacy of photos” as another example. (I mentioned “the privacy of email addresses” in my last post.)

Let’s say you give me viewing access to a photo that you’ve posted on your favorite server. How do you keep it private? What digital rights management could you employ? Would the DRM say what software am I allowed to use to view this photo? Am I allowed to view your photo in previously unknown software that I’ve written myself? Can I use any other cloud-based software to help me consider that photo? Am I allowed to derive knowledge from that photo and use that knowledge in other contexts? Could I get recommendations from other knowledge bases based on the fact that I enjoyed the photo?

The future possibilities of advanced social networking systems get progressively more difficult to represent with the kind of strict DRM code we might be tempted to use in social computing today. As the federated social systems evolve, the concept of “privacy” must take on semantic representation.

A real world social example: Say I give you a photo of me and Mike exploring the secret tunnels under University Hall and say that it’s for your eyes only since we probably shouldn’t have been down there. Say this is the first and only time you learn that I know how to get into the tunnels. Later, your friend John asks you for help getting into the tunnels. Should you recommend he talk to me? Of what I showed you, what did I intend to be kept private– the photo itself or the content of the photo?

Advocating strict concepts of privacy in social networks ties us into “walled-garden” systems. As possible usage of data expands, there is no way to export privacy without adding semantics. We’re going to need to get used to “privacy” being a somewhat loose concept in social systems.

UPDATE: Rewritten dec 29, 2008. Thanks, Chad.